 +86-377-60385200   best@explosionproof-solutions.com
Home » EX LIBRARY » IEC / NEC-CEC Deployment Comparison

IEC / NEC-CEC Deployment Comparison

Views: 80     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2017-05-08      Origin: Site

Mixing of Codes is Usually Not Permitted, and this equally applies to cable glands or cable connectors.

Accepting that Flameproof is not Explosion Proof and vice versa is very important, and whilst some confusion frequently occurs between both the terminology and understanding of the principles involved, the two concepts follow distinctly different testing and installation standards. For this reason alone great care should be taken when indulging in selection and installation from differing codes of practice.

Here is a comparison of the testing methods adopted for Ex d IIC Cable Glands to IEC 60079-1 & Class I Division 1 ABCD (NEC) Explosion Proof Cable Connectors to UL 2225 intended for use in hazardous locations, specifically for use with Ex d IIC (IEC) & Class I Division 1 (NEC or CEC) Explosion Proof apparatus.

CABLE ENTRY DEVICES - PRODUCT CERTIFICATION TESTS

Protection method

Ex d

Explosion Proof

STANDARD

IEC 60079-1

UL2225, CSA 22.2

HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST AT

450 PSI FOR 2 MINUTES

UP TO 2000 PSI FOR 2 MINUTES

ENCLOSURE TYPE / SIZE USED FOR   EXPLOSION TESTING

NOT APPLICABLE

EXPLOSION PROOF 29 LITRES ENCLOSURE   VOLUME

A compound barrier type (seal type) cable gland must always be used, under the NEC / CEC wiring code rules, for any Class I Division 1 or Division 2 explosion proof equipment installed in hazardous locations.

 


All rights reserved NANYANG BEST INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CO.,LTD